Editorial Guidelines

Our promise: clarity, accuracy, and transparency in everything we publish.

Our mission

Supplements are complex. Our job is to cut through the noise and present information that’s accurate, balanced, and easy to understand. Every page on StackBB is designed to help you make smarter health decisions—without hype.

Evidence & sources

We rely on scientific research, not marketing claims. This means:

• • Peer-reviewed studies and systematic reviews are our primary references.
• • Reputable databases such as PubMed, Cochrane, and official health agencies are prioritized.
• • Transparency: when evidence is weak, conflicting, or preliminary, we say so clearly.

How we write

Our editorial process follows a few simple rules:

• • Plain English: we explain mechanisms without jargon.
• • No “miracle” claims: health is complex, and supplements are never magic pills.
• • Balanced view: benefits, side effects, interactions, and dosage are covered together.
• • Fact-checking: every article is reviewed before publication for accuracy.

Keeping content updated

Research moves quickly. We regularly revisit our articles to make sure they reflect the most recent evidence. Updated sections are noted where relevant. Outdated or disproven claims are removed—no exceptions.

Independence & transparency

StackBB is independent. Our editorial team makes content decisions without influence from sponsors, partners, or advertisers. If we use affiliate links, we disclose them clearly. They never affect our rankings or reviews.

Health disclaimer

All content on StackBB is for educational purposes only. It is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult your healthcare provider before starting, changing, or stopping any supplement.

Questions?

If you spot an error or want to know more about our editorial process, please get in touch. We value feedback and update content accordingly.