Editorial Guidelines

Our promise: clarity, accuracy, and transparency in everything we publish.

Our mission

Supplements are complex. Our role is to cut through the noise and present information that's accurate, balanced, and easy to understand. Each page on Stackbb focuses on explaining the available evidence around supplements in a clear and accessible way.

Sources

We rely on scientific research, not marketing claims. This means:

• • Peer-reviewed studies and systematic reviews from the scientific literature are prioritized.
• • Reputable databases such as PubMed, Cochrane, and official public health agencies are prioritized.
• • Transparency: when evidence is weak, conflicting, or preliminary, we say so clearly.

How we write

Our editorial process follows a few simple rules:

• • Plain English: we explain mechanisms without jargon.
• • No exaggerated claims: supplements have limits and effects can vary between individuals.
• • Balanced view: benefits, side effects, interactions, and usage considerations are covered together.
• • Fact-checking: accuracy checks are part of our editorial workflow.

Keeping content updated

Research moves quickly. We regularly revisit our articles to make sure they reflect the most recent evidence. Updated sections are noted where relevant. Outdated or disproven claims are removed, no exceptions.

Independence & transparency

Stackbb is independent. Our editorial team makes content decisions without influence from sponsors, partners, or advertisers. If we use affiliate links, we disclose them clearly. They never affect our rankings or reviews.

Health disclaimer

All content on Stackbb is for educational purposes only. It is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional regarding your individual situation.

Questions?

If you spot an error or want to know more about our editorial process, please get in touch. We value feedback and update content accordingly.